China-Pakistan-Bangladesh Bloc: The “Devil Triangle”, A Strategic Threat to India’s Regional Influence?

China-Pakistan-Bangladesh Bloc Description

The emergence of a new China-Pakistan-Bangladesh bloc signals a major geopolitical shift in South Asia. Could this alliance challenge India’s strategic dominance in the region?

Table of Contents

1. Introduction China-Pakistan-Bangladesh bloc
2. Background of the Emerging Bloc
3. The End of “South Asia” as a Unified Concept
4. China’s Regional Ambitions and SAARC’s Decline
5. Strategic Implications: The “Devil Triangle”
6. India’s Urgent Diplomatic and Military Response
7. Conclusion and Key Takeaways
8. Recap Table
9. FAQs
10. Related Articles from Geoinflux

1. Introduction China-Pakistan-Bangladesh bloc

The geopolitical landscape of South Asia is witnessing a seismic shift. Recent developments point towards the formation of a new China-Pakistan-Bangladesh bloc, which experts believe is a calculated move to marginalize India’s influence and render SAARC obsolete.

As India evaluates its response, the stakes could not be higher.

2. Background of the China-Pakistan-Bangladesh Bloc

In a significant development, China recently hosted a trilateral summit with representatives from Pakistan and Bangladesh in Yunnan Province.

This was the first such meeting involving these three nations in this format, raising speculation about a new regional grouping that conspicuously excludes India.

While China and Pakistan have long desired such a coalition, Bangladesh had historically maintained a neutral stance under Sheikh Hasina.

However, the rise of Mohammad Yunus in Bangladesh appears to be a game-changer. Sources close to the matter suggest that Yunus is actively working to undermine Indo-Bangladeshi ties, aligning Bangladesh closer to China and Pakistan.

3. The End of “South Asia” as a Unified Concept

Traditionally, the region from Afghanistan to Bangladesh, including Nepal and Sri Lanka, was referred to as South Asia. But increasing ideological and economic differences—especially between India and Pakistan—have rendered this term obsolete.

Key Contrasts:

• Pakistan: A radicalized state with unstable governance and strong Taliban links.
• India: A fast-growing, democratic economy on track to become the world’s third-largest.

Despite shared ancestry and cultural roots, a vast divergence has emerged between the two nations in terms of governance, gender rights, and global alignment.

This ideological divide has led many geopolitical analysts to suggest that South Asia no longer exists as a coherent regional bloc. Instead, they argue for a reconfiguration, separating Pakistan, Afghanistan, and even Iran from India and its closer allies.

4. China’s Regional Ambitions and SAARC’s Decline

China’s interest in South Asia is nothing new. For years, Beijing has either tried to enter SAARC or promote a parallel alliance more favorable to its interests.

SAARC, plagued by stagnation, has become functionally defunct, with no summit held in nearly a decade. India, aware of SAARC’s ineffectiveness, has quietly moved away from it.

China’s Current Strategy:

• Bangladesh under Yunus is likely to join any China-led alliance.
• Nepal’s K.P. Oli, a pro-China voice, could follow suit.
• Sri Lanka remains hesitant but is still a geopolitical wildcard.

This raises the possibility of a powerful bloc comprising China, Pakistan, Bangladesh, and Nepal—a grouping that significantly enhances China’s footprint in the Indian subcontinent.

5. Strategic Implications: The “Devil Triangle”

While this emerging China Pakistan Bangladesh bloc is not a military coalition, its geopolitical objectives are clear: undermine India’s regional influence and challenge the Indo-Pacific strategy led by the United States.

Indian military analysts have dubbed this alliance (China-Pakistan-Bangladesh bloc) a “Devil Triangle”, signaling a looming strategic threat. With the return of Donald Trump and uncertain U.S. policy coherence, China’s timing appears optimal for regional realignment.

If this alignment continues unchallenged, it could rapidly evolve into a broader coalition that sidelines India in its own neighborhood.

6. India’s Urgent Diplomatic and Military Response

India cannot afford complacency. A multi-pronged approach is needed to counterbalance this emerging axis:

Strategic Recommendations:

• Deepen military ties with Japan as a counterbalance in the Indo-Pacific.
• Impose diplomatic costs on countries acting against Indian interests, as emphasized by EAM Dr. S. Jaishankar.
• Project hard power, shedding the perception of being a “soft” regional player bogged down by internal politics.

Failure to act decisively could lead to an expanded alliance—possibly a geopolitical “octagon”—further isolating India in the region.

7. Conclusion and Key Takeaways

The formation of a China-Pakistan-Bangladesh bloc represents one of the most significant regional challenges India has faced in recent years.

With SAARC declining and China filling the vacuum, India must adopt a bold, proactive strategy to maintain its influence in South Asia.

8. Recap Table: The China-Pakistan-Bangladesh Bloc at a Glance

Aspect	Details
Countries Involved	China, Pakistan, Bangladesh (with Nepal as potential)
Strategic Objective	Counter India, replace SAARC, assert China’s regional dominance
Bangladesh’s Shift	Aligned under Mohammad Yunus, distancing from India
India’s Challenges	Diminishing regional influence, increased China-backed alliances
Recommended Indian Response	Military partnerships, strategic deterrence, projecting regional leadership

9. Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)

Q1: What is the China-Pakistan-Bangladesh bloc?

A: It is a potential new regional alliance being shaped to counterbalance India’s dominance in South Asia and fill the vacuum left by SAARC’s inactivity.

Q2: Why is this China-Pakistan-Bangladesh bloc a concern for India?

A: It marginalizes India’s strategic role in the subcontinent and could lead to increased Chinese influence in neighboring countries.

Q3: Is Bangladesh officially part of the alliance?

A: While not formalized, Bangladesh under Mohammad Yunus is signaling a clear shift toward China and Pakistan’s orbit.

Q4: Could this alliance turn into a military threat?

A: Not currently. It’s a geopolitical and diplomatic alliance, though it may lay the groundwork for future military cooperation.

Q5: What should India do to respond?

A: Strengthen alliances with Japan and Southeast Asian nations, assert regional leadership, and adopt a policy of strategic consequences.

10. Related Articles from Geoinflux

• Ajit Doval’s Beijing Visit and India-China Tensions
• The End of SAARC? India’s Strategic Shift to BIMSTEC
• India’s Indo-Pacific Strategy: Challenges and Opportunities

---

📚 References China-Pakistan-Bangladesh bloc

1. The Diplomat. (2024, June). What Does the China-Pakistan-Bangladesh Trilateral Mean for India? Retrieved from https://thediplomat.com/2024/06/what-does-the-china-pakistan-bangladesh-trilateral-mean-for-india/
2. South China Morning Post. (2024). China holds trilateral meeting with Pakistan and Bangladesh to boost economic links. Retrieved from https://www.scmp.com/news/china/diplomacy/article/3261396/china-holds-trilateral-meeting-pakistan-and-bangladesh-focus-economic-links
3. BBC News. (2024). Mohammad Yunus: Bangladesh’s Power Shift Explained. Retrieved from https://www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-68929567
4. Brookings Institution. (2024). The Failed Promise of Pakistan’s Hybrid Regime. Retrieved from https://www.brookings.edu/articles/the-failed-promise-of-pakistans-hybrid-regime/
5. World Bank. (2024). India Country Overview. Retrieved from https://www.worldbank.org/en/country/india/overview
6. Carnegie India. (2024). Beyond South Asia: Rethinking Regional Frameworks. Retrieved from https://carnegieindia.org/2024/05/27/beyond-south-asia-rethinking-regional-frameworks-pub-92497
7. The Diplomat. (2022). Should China Be Allowed Full Membership in SAARC? Retrieved from https://thediplomat.com/2022/11/should-china-be-allowed-full-membership-in-saarc/
8. Observer Research Foundation (ORF). (2023). SAARC: A Body in Coma. Retrieved from https://www.orfonline.org/research/saarc-a-body-in-coma
9. Al Jazeera. (2020). Nepal PM Oli Says Lord Ram Was Nepali; India Reacts. Retrieved from https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2020/7/15/nepal-pm-oli-says-lord-ram-was-nepali-india-reacts
10. Reuters. (2023). Sri Lanka Receives IMF Bailout to Recover from Debt Crisis. Retrieved from https://www.reuters.com/world/asia-pacific/sri-lanka-imf-bailout-2023-03-20/
11. Chellaney, B. (2023). China’s Subcontinental Push. Retrieved from https://chellaney.net/2023/11/10/chinas-subcontinental-push/
12. Foreign Policy. (2024). Trump’s Asia Strategy and the Future of the Quad. Retrieved from https://foreignpolicy.com/2024/06/18/trump-foreign-policy-asia-china-quad/
13. Ministry of External Affairs, India. (2023). India-Japan Special Strategic and Global Partnership – Joint Statement. Retrieved from https://www.mea.gov.in/bilateral-documents.htm?dtl/35987/Joint_Statement_on_the_IndiaJapan_Special_Strategic_and_Global_Partnership_2023
14. The Business Standard. (2024). Mohammad Yunus and Bangladesh’s Foreign Policy Shift. Retrieved from https://www.tbsnews.net/bangladesh/politics/mohammad-yunus-foreign-policy-direction-780214

---